Fluids are drugs!

The information was excellent but the test was ridiculous! Even listening to the lecture twice and knowing the questions the second time around I still did not get 100%

Very useful course. Would highly recommend.

I would like to review the lecture and have access to the notes as I take the exam, open book. Too many y inter

Very academic information - little on practical use of this information

Heavy on pathophysiology

not as clinical as hoped

Good luck passing the test!

Heavy on pathophysiology without much discussion on clinical application.

Exam far too academic and difficult.

NOT RECOMMENDED. This was a very technical presentation with some useful information. However, if you are taking this course for CE credit, the exam process is very detailed and asks questions in a very misleading and purposefully confusing. Even when re-took the course, the answers to the questions are not overtly found in the presentation. Very disappointing CE!

Very in depth science on a microscopic function level with very little take home message as to how to effectively implement change for the better. I attempted to take the test, and no way would I pass. The questions were super in depth and not pertaining to bigger take home message, and the test question format further complicated the ability to answer correctly.

There was a lot of important information in this, but it was overwhelming for just an hour long seminar. The presenter spoke very quickly at times which made it difficult to follow.

A lot of information with a lot of detail.

Important concept to understand that was well explained but a little rushed.

To technical

The examination on this is a little obtuse. I hate answer any/all. So arbitrary.

It was very good that this presentation conveys important new information for patients but it was too challenging to follow due to some factors. The speaker can simplify many biochemistry level of vocabularies into one like EG agents and allow the audience to read the words later as needed. Pronouncing those terminology do not helpful for attention but distract as hypnotic technique does. Also, this lecture requires intense concentration now that any kind of distraction, such as joking, was so disturbing. It was like somebody does gag in the middle of discussion about serious crime scene. Anyway I had to watch this video 4 times to complete my learning.

good

Important material

I thought this was going to be a revamp of the same old. A lot of new information presented. I have been able to rethink and modify my treatment approaches.

Good presentation but needs prior background knowledge on ABI, glycocalyx and revised Starling's law to understand the material.

Great speaking skills but the content was extremely technical and I didn't feel like I gained much I could use in day-to-day clinical practice other than a newfound dislike for chloride's presence in most of my fluid choices. The exam was also a bit ridiculously difficult.

Great information but far beyond integration in 60 minutes. This is a semester course.

The speaker spoke so fast it was hard to keep up with the lecture and the use of many acronyms made it difficult to follow.

Poorly presented, not more than 10% clinically useful. Do not recommend.

It was a lot of information in a short amount of time. It became very over whelming and the test questions felt impossible. It was very advanced for an informational presentation. I feel that it could use condensed content to get the information across better.

This course was really tough to follow. A lot of info presented very rapidly and the test was made more difficult by having multiple facts within each question.

Wayyy too much detail for a GP.

Very very technical, which is good in a way, but it would be better if clinical relevance was emphasized more.

A lot of information in 1 hour. The speaker started to talk faster as the hour progressed, making it more difficult to follow.

good information but presented way to fast

If multiple people that the course is intended for can not pass the exam, it is a reflection of the either the presenter not teaching what they wanted to be tested or the exam not testing what was intended to be taught. Very frustrating. We are brighter than this. I did learn despite the test.

The course was quite informative but I found the questions at the end difficult to answer despite reviewing the course material on three occasions

This course was a little over-technical in a biochem way. It was not as practical as I was hoping.

Good information.

More technical than practical. Exam was extremely challenging. I watched the presentation 3 times and still couldn't pass the exam with a 70%

very in depth lecture